Patch information is provided when available. This information may include identifying information, values, definitions, and related links. Low: vulnerabilities with a CVSS base score of 0.0–3.9Įntries may include additional information provided by organizations and efforts sponsored by CISA.Medium: vulnerabilities with a CVSS base score of 4.0–6.9.High: vulnerabilities with a CVSS base score of 7.0–10.0.The division of high, medium, and low severities correspond to the following scores: Vulnerabilities are based on the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) vulnerability naming standard and are organized according to severity, determined by the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) standard. Please visit NVD for updated vulnerability entries, which include CVSS scores once they are available. In some cases, the vulnerabilities in the bulletin may not yet have assigned CVSS scores. Which makes me even angrier than I already am at our own governor who refused, out of political spite, to set up a state exchange.The CISA Vulnerability Bulletin provides a summary of new vulnerabilities that have been recorded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Vulnerability Database (NVD) in the past week. What concerns me the most - the exchange system will always be buggy and unworkable as it needs to interface with too many other data systems. The push to privatize what government does has led inextricably to a situation where our government, as the consumer, cannot get satisfaction, and basically we're forced to pay these same suppliers more because our penny-wise/pound-foolish approach to funding what our nation needs gives practically all the power to the suppliers.ġ000% correct. Our nation's longstanding procurement system won't penalize them nor make them "fix" what they did for free, because, like most everything else in our government at this point, the procurement system is ridiculously biased in the favor of big business contractors rather than in the best interest of taxpayers. They're now going to bring in even more money to fix what they did previously. The job of the managers in charge of those projects is to make profit for the enterprise. And even there, it's actually bad- evil management, not bad-incompetent management. Yes, it is bad management - at CGI and USSI. The push to privatize what government does has led inextricably to a situation where our government, as the consumer, cannot get satisfaction, and basically we're forced to pay these same suppliers more because our penny-wise/pound-foolish approach to funding what our nation needs gives practically all the power to the suppliers.